Ad Wim Wrote:Ik vrees dat dit ook exit voor Djoko wordt. Davy speelt veel te snel voor Soderling en zie ik als favoriet tegen Soderling. En dan is het klaar.

buurs Wrote:Mensen, ik ga 1x mijn mening en verwachting geven over het spel van Nadal.

Op dit moment is het absoluut nog niet goed genoeg en zeker niet top 5 waardig.

Vergeet niet hoelang hij eruit is geweest en dat hij in het voor hem moeilijkste seizoen terug is gekomen.
Dan is het erg lastig om je in vorm te spelen.

Ik denk dat tot het gravelseizoen van 2010 het nog lastig wordt voor Nadal, maar dat hij daarna zijn oude niveau weer terug zal hebben.

Ik denk en weet bijna wel zeker dat Nadal over precies een jaar weer nummer 1 van de wereld is!

Hier mogen jullie mij op afrekenen.

Quote:1. Murray beats Verdasco in 2 : Murray is qualified, Verdasco out,

the winner of Fed-JMDP is the second qualifier

(Fed being first if he wins, JMDP being second to Murray if he wins)

1a. Fed beats JMDP : Fed is 1st, Murray 2nd
1b. JMDP beats Fed : Murray is 1st, JMDP second

2. Murray beats Verdasco in 3 sets and wins 4 more games than Verdasco (for instance 6/4 4/6 6/2) : Murray is qualified, Verdasco out,

JMDP has to beat Fed in 2 sets to qualify and eliminate Federer (in that case, Murray is first of the group, JMDP is 2nd)

... or in 3 sets with 8 games difference, which is huge (for instance 6/1 6/7 6/2)

Fed is first of the group if he wins, or if he loses in 3 sets by no more than 6 games difference -for instance not worse than 6/3 6/7 6/2

3. Murray beats Verdasco in 3 sets but doesn't win more than 3 games more than Verdasco (for instance 6/3 3/6 6/3) :

Verdasco is out,

Murray is not completely qualified as he can still fear a victory by JMDP in 3 sets with a big game difference for JMDP (the worst case for Murray being a win by JMDP by 7 games difference, for instance 6/2 6/7 6/2)

JMDP has to win in 2 sets or 3 sets with a big game difference,

Federer has to win one set and ensure that he doesn't lose by not more than 7 games (for instance 6/2 6/7 6/2 would be enough for him ... even to finish number 1 of the group) ,

4. Verdasco beats Murray in 2 sets : Murray is out, Federer is qualified

JMDP has to beat Fed to qualify and eliminate Verdasco (and JMDP would be first in that case)

5. Verdasco beats Murray in 3 sets with at least two games difference (for instance 6/4 4/6 6/4) : Murray is out, Federer is qualified,

JMDP qualifies and eliminates Verdasco if he wins ... or if he loses in 3 sets but gets at least 2 more games than Federer, which is very hard (for instance 6/4 0/6 6/4 or 7/6 2/6 7/6)

Else Verdasco goes to SF with Federer

6. Verdasco beats Murray in 3 sets with only one game difference or not more games than Murray : Verdasco is out, Federer is qualified,

JMDP qualifies and eliminates Murray if he wins ... or if he loses in 3 sets but gets a lot more games than Federer, even more than 2

Else Murray is the second to Federer

buurs Wrote:daarom reageer ik de laatste tijd ook BIJNA niet meer op jou.